爱上海,上海419论坛,上海龙凤419 - Powered by Australia

Australia

first_img AustraliaAsia – Pacific AustraliaAsia – Pacific November 19, 2020 Find out more to go further RSF_en Receive email alerts January 21, 2021 Find out more On eve of the G20 Riyadh summit, RSF calls for public support to secure the release of jailed journalists in Saudi Arabia Help by sharing this information News News February 22, 2021 Find out more News The Broadcasting Services Act, which came into force on 1 January 2000, spells out material to be banned from websites, including pornography involving children, bestiality, excessive violence, real sex acts and information about crime, violence and drug use. The arbiter of this is the regulatory Australian Broadcasting Authority (ABA), which asks the ISPs of sites concerned to take reasonable steps to bar access to them.Civil liberty groups oppose these restrictions, as well as the obligation of ISPs to offer content filters to their customers. Most ISPs are refusing to comply and simply list sites that provide such products.In October 2001, the Cybercrime Act came into effect, allowing judges to force suspects to reveal their encryption codes. A few months later, the federal senate, rejected an amendment to the telecommunications law that would have allowed the security services to intercept e-mail without court permission.Eight major international media – including Yahoo!, CNN, Reuters and The Guardian – said on 28 May 2002 they would give legal support to an appeal by the Dow Jones US media group to the High Court against a libel conviction. The plaintiff was Australian businessman Joseph Gutnick, who said he had been libelled in an article on the website of the group’s Barrons magazine. The Victoria state supreme court, saying the article could be read in the state, convicted Dow Jones, whose lawyer warned that the ruling was a serious precedent that would threaten the online media worldwide.In November 2002, the ABA refused to censor three anti-globalisation sites that called on demonstrators against a World Trade Organisation meeting in Sydney that month to equip themselves with baseball bats and gas-masks. The authorities, especially the police, had asked for the censorship on grounds it was clear incitement to physically attack the police.The government responded to the ABA’s refusal by moving to set up a centre to combat high tech crime. The daily newspaper The Courier-Mail said it would give the federal government power to censor websites directly. Organisation News Google experiments drop Australian media from search results June 18, 2003 – Updated on January 20, 2016 Australia RSF condemns Facebook’s blocking of journalistic content in Australia Links:Electronic Frontier Australia, on Internet censorshipThe Australian Broadcasting AuthorityZdnet on new technology Follow the news on Australialast_img

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *